“To the Point” Response
“One of the reasons this newspaper loves letters to the editor is because the letter writers often say things better than the editor ever could”. When newspapers decide the better way to present facts to the readers that is biased news. If only letters that the editors think says their point is better on issues the editors believe in and only print letters of this character that is in complete opposition of the ethical code. The readers write opinion on facts and issues affecting them. The writer has knowledge of the situation that the reporters don’t know or does not believe it is relevant to the articles they are writing. The reader is just an ordinary citizen willing to express what they believe is a wrong in government. For the news to censor or edit what a reader needs other citizens to understand if it is not in the newspapers point is biased news. Response of the readers to the newspaper is a second point of view and should take priority to be included in the next issue. To the point will show my point, as this response will be censored for contradicting the editor’s belief. One of the reason today’s public is so ignorant is because the readers never know who’s point was censored. To the point is when people we trust limit the facts they telling us to only their view.
I have written letters of the NH Supreme Court using discrimination to protect one of their own. The news does not believe this is a point the citizens of the USA need to know. Judge Peter Fauver criminally violated the Constitution to benefit people that he wanted to win intentionally harming local residents of NH and the USA. If what I am saying is not the truth then Fauver and the SC have legal recourse to stop me. “There is nothing so powerful as truth” words of Daniel Webster printed on the front page of the newspaper. To the point just does not get it.
Peter Macdonald Sgt USMC Semper Fi
465 Packers falls Rd Lee NH 03824 603-659-6217
No comments:
Post a Comment